site stats

Roop kumar v. mohan thedani

http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/union-of-india-and-ors-vs-shakti-lpg-ltd-and-anr

Answer-In which of the following cases Supreme Court rejected …

WebNov 11, 2024 · Roop Kumar vs Mohan Thedani on 2 April, 2003 it would be proper to deal with the plea relating to scope and ambit of Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act. Section 91 relates to evidence of terms of contract, grants and other disposition of properties reduced to form of document. WebApr 8, 2024 · The Supreme Court held in Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani: AIR 2003 SC 2418, as under: “The grounds of exclusion of extrinsic evidence are: (i) to admit inferior evidence when law requires superior would amount to nullifying the law, ... In Satyam Kumar Sah v. Narcotic Control Bureau, 2024 SCC OnLine Del 8409, it is pointed out that Section 65 ... generation z focus https://3s-acompany.com

Recent Landmark Cases under Indian Evidence Act, 1872

WebFeb 18, 2008 · Commissioner of Customs, Calcutta and Ors. v. Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. and Anr. [2004 (165) ELT 257] (Para 5) 2. Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani [2003 (6) SCC 595] (Para 5) JUDGEMENT: Harjit Singh Bedi, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The facts have been taken from SLP (C) No. 15278/2006. 3. WebJun 2, 2024 · In Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani, (2003) 6 SCC 595 case, explaining the rationale of the section observed: “Section 91 relates to evidence of terms of contract, … WebMay 1, 2024 · The case of Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani (2003) concerns the scope and application of Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, as explained by the … dea testing policies

Roop Kumar v Mohan Thedani on 02 April 2003 - LawyerServices

Category:Secondary Evidence of Documents & Objections to Admissibility – …

Tags:Roop kumar v. mohan thedani

Roop kumar v. mohan thedani

Vimal Chand Ghevarchand Jain & Ors. Vs. Ramakant Eknath Jajoo

WebRespondent No.1 Sh.Mohan Thedani is a tenant in respect of premises No.15A/16 (Shop No.1), Ajmal Khan Road, New Delhi at a monthly rent of Rs.2,000/-. The said shop was … WebJan 19, 2001 · Mohan Thedani is a tenant in respect of premises No. 15A/16 (Shop No. 1), Ajmal Khan Road, New Delhi at a monthly rent of Rs. 2,000/-. The said shop was registered …

Roop kumar v. mohan thedani

Did you know?

WebSh. Roop Kumar vs Mohan Thedani & Ors. Judgement of Delhi High Court, Judgement by Delhi High Court, Latest Judgement by Delhi High Court, Judgement of 19 January, 2001, … WebMar 23, 2009 · Sohan Lal [(2000) 1 SCC 434] and Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani [(2003) 6 SCC 595] to which we would revert to a little later. 20. Indisputably when a true character of a document is questioned, extrinsic evidence by way of oral evidence is admissible. {See R. Janakiraman Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, CBI, SPE, Madras (2006) 1 SCC 697 ...

WebJul 11, 2024 · In Mohan Lal Shamlal Soni v. Union of India, AIR 1991 SC 1346, the Supreme Court held as under: “It is a cardinal rule in the law of evidence that the best available … Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani . Arijit Pasayat, J.— Leave granted. 2. This case is a classic example of a just cause getting defeated by setting up dubious pleas and depriving a party of what is legally due to him. It is one of those innumerable cases where course of justice has been attempted to be deflected by factual and legal red herrings. 3.

WebDec 25, 2024 · OOP KUMAR V. MOHAN THEDANI, AIR 2003 SC 2418 COURT: The Supreme Court of India FACTS: This case exemplifies how a legitimate cause can be undermined by the use of questionable arguments that result in a … WebMar 23, 2009 · On or about 1.7.1978, the possession of the said property was allegedly handed over to the father of the respondent as a licensee at an agreed licence fee of Rs.1,257.50 per month. The said partnership firm was dissolved pursuant whereto the appellant became the owner of the said property.

WebMay 1, 2024 · Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani 9 min read COLUMNS JUDGMENT Recent Landmark Cases under Indian Evidence Act, 1872 May 1, 2024 By Arryan Mohanty …

WebIn recent decisions i.e. Bhavnagar University v. patina Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd., (2002) AIR SCW 4939 and Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani , (2003) 3 SCALE 611 the view in the said case was reiterated Statements of fact as to what transpired at the hearing recorded in the judgment of the court, are conclusive of the facts so stated and no one can ... generation z expectationsWebApr 2, 2003 · Roop Kumar v/s Mohan Thedani Civil Appeal No. 2631 of 2003 Decided On, 02 April 2003 At, Supreme Court of India By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVARAJ V. … deatex group srlWebMar 5, 2024 · However, the Supreme Court in Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani . (2003) 6 SCC 595 while dealing with the Sections 91 & 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter, „Evidence Act") held as under: "19. Sections 91 and 92 apply only when the document on the face of it contains or appears to contain all the terms of the contract. dea testosterone telehealthWebDec 15, 2024 · The Supreme Court of India in the 2003 case of Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani observed that Section 91 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 prohibits proof of the … dea tennessee officeWebJan 19, 2001 · Roop Kumar v/s Mohan Thedani Regular First Appeal No. 77 of 1997 Decided On, 19 January 2001 At, High Court of Delhi By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For the Appearing Parties: Maninder Acharya, N.K. Kaul, Pardip Nandrajog, R.P. Bansal, Advocates. Judgment Text A.K. SIKRI, J. deatexgroup s.r.lWebApr 16, 2004 · Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. 2003 2 SCC 111 and Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani 2003 6 SCC 595.] 10. Even otherwise, the plea that the medical evidence is contrary to the ocular evidence has also no substance. It is merely based on the purported opinion expressed by an author. generation z food consumptionWebThis blog is written by Siddharth Sanjay Dubey, a second-year student, CWC Law College, Mumbai University. generation z fun facts